http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-10637059
The above news article seems to focus on only one ground in the appeal, the fact that the WAG cull order was inappropriately worded to cover the whole of Wales. In fact, the cull order was quashed on ALL THREE grounds, not least that a maximum reduction of 9 per cent in TB infections after killing 1,500 badgers was “significant” enough to justify killing so many protected wild animals. Why does the article focus only on the ‘technicality’???